$type=ticker$count=12$cols=4$cate=0

RIGHT AGAINST ILLEGAL DETENTION: WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

RIGHT AGAINST ILLEGAL DETENTION: WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS Generally, writ means an order issued by any authority. In India, writs are issued un...

RIGHT AGAINST ILLEGAL DETENTION: WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

Generally, writ means an order issued by any authority. In India, writs are issued under Article 32 and 226 of the Constitution by the Supreme Court and the High Courts of the states for the enforcement of fundamental rights enshrined under Part III of the Constitution of India. One of the most widely used writs is the writ of Habeas Corpus. The Latin term Habeas Corpus means “you may have the body”.  The writ of Habeas Corpus is the most powerful tool for safeguarding one’s Right to Life and Liberty and is commonly used against illegal detention made by Police, any public Authority, or individuals.

By the order of this writ, the court calls upon the person who has detained another person, to inform the court reasons for such detention and by what authority he has detained that individual. If it is found that the detention is illegal and unjustifiable, the detained person is ordered to be released. The rapid release of an individual from unlawful detention is the main objective of this writ.

It is important to understand by what manner detention can be termed as unlawful.  If a person is detained by the police officer and is not produced before the magistrate within twenty-four hours of his arrest, his detention becomes illegal and is in contravention to Article 22 of the Constitution of India. However, when reasonable restrictions are put upon a person by law, the detention is not unlawful as provided under Article 21 which declares that no person shall be deprived of his personal life and liberty, except according to the procedure established by law. The right of habeas corpus collapses when a person is detained in accordance with the law and the procedure established by law.

In Deepak Bajaj vs. the State of Maharashtra, the writ of habeas corpus was described as a “great constitutional privilege or the first security of civil liberty”.  The writ becomes more significant to assure individual freedom in the country. The writ of habeas corpus can be brought up by the detainee himself, or his relatives or any person associated with the detained person’s benefit of ensuring that personal freedom.  To check the legitimacy of detainment the court order’s the body of authority to deliver the detained individual and give an appropriate explanation as to his detainment; and if it is found out by the court that his detention is unlawful, the aggrieved person is released by the order of the court. In Sunil Batra vs Delhi Administration, the Supreme Court widened the scope of the writ of habeas corpus, by stating that this writ can also be filed for the violation of the fundamental rights of the prisoners. The Superior Court of the country that is the Supreme Court and the High Court of the states are independent of the executive and the legislature and thus, they can issue the writ in the nature of habeas corpus, even on the basis of a letter addressed to them.

Jurisdiction plays an important role in deciding where the petition for issuance of a writ of habeas corpus will lie. In A.D.M Jabalpur vs. Shivakanth Shukla famously known as the habeas corpus case which was heard by the constitutional bench of the Supreme Court in 1975 the majority of judges permitted unrestricted powers of arrest and detention during an emergency. However, Justice Khanna stated in his separate judgment that “detention without trial is an anathema to all those who love personal liberty...”. To constitute unlawful detention, physical confinement is not necessary. The writ of habeas corpus not only aims to release the unlawfully detained person but it also used as a tool of protection from inhumane treatment of the prisoners inside the jail.  The scope of this writ was widened by the landmark judgment of the Supreme Court in Maneka Gandhi vs Union of India as well as by the forty-fourth amendment of the constitution. In this case, the interpretation of Article 21 was extended and it was vehemently stated that the term “procedure established by law” in this article articulated the element of justness and fairness. The Court can issue this writ not only against a public authority but also against individuals. For instance, contract laborers are often exploited by their contractors because of their innocence and unformed nature. However, several instances have been reported where the family members of the detained person filed this writ for the release of a detainee from the unlawful custody of their masters.

In conclusion, it is expedient to say that the writ of habeas corpus is an immediate remedy available to the detainee or his relatives from his unlawful custody. Since it is for the enforcement of the fundamental rights of the individual’s personal liberty, the writ does not include the costly procedure and anyone can file this application in accordance with the procedure established by law.  The writ of habeas corpus is a strong element for safeguarding the individual’s freedom of liberty from the hands of arbitrary actions of individuals under power or authority.

 

COMMENTS

Name

#metoo,2,ADR,1,Adultery as a ground of Divorce,1,Agricultural Reforms Bills 2020,1,alimony,1,Anton Pillar Orders,1,APMC under FPTC act,1,Arbitration Act,1,Arbitration Agreement 2019,1,Arbitration and Conciliation Amendment Act,1,Arbitration Clause,1,Arbitration rules,1,Article 19 and hate speech,1,Article 14,1,Article 15,1,Article 21,4,Business Laws,2,Car theft,2,Cheque Bounce Law in India,1,Citizen Rights,3,Civil Law,1,Confidentiality Agreements in India,1,Constitutional Remedies,2,Consumer Laws,2,Consumer Protection Act,2,Consumer Protection Act 1986,1,Consumer Rights,3,Conversion Damages Copyright,1,COPRA,1,Copyright Act 1957,3,Copyright Assignment,1,Copyright Infringement,1,Copyright Infringment,1,Copyright Law,1,Copyright Licensing,1,crimes against women,2,Criminal Law,9,CrPC,2,CrPC 1973,6,Cruelty against wife,1,Divorce,1,Doctor Liability for injury,1,Domestic Violence,1,Domestic Violence Act,1,Dowry,1,Dowry Prohibition Act,2,DV Act 2005,1,E-commerce Rules 2020,1,E-trading for farmers,1,Environmental Rights,1,F.I.R,1,F.I.R.,8,false complaints against the husband and in-laws,1,False Dowry Case,1,false promise of marriage,1,Farmers Rights,1,First Information Report,1,FTPC Act 2020,1,Fundamental Rights,1,Hate-speech in india,1,High-Courts,1,Hindu Succession Act,1,Hindu Women,1,Home-Buyers as Financial Creditors,1,How to write a legal-notice,1,Hurting religious sentiments,1,Indian Contract Act,2,Indian Copyright Act,1,Indian Evidence Act,1,Indian penalCode,1,Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code,2,Insurance claim,2,Intellectual Property,1,Interlocutory injunction copyright,1,John Doe Orders,1,Josephine Shine v. UOI,1,Law against Dowry,1,Law against Hate-speech,1,Law of Copyright,1,Lawyer,1,Legal Notice,1,Legal Remedies Against Copyright Infringment,1,Lost vehicle report,1,maintenance,1,Mandamus,1,Marriage,1,Matrimonial Law,1,Matrimonial Laws,1,meaning of hate speech,1,Medical Mal-practise,1,Medical Negligence,1,Medical Negligence India,1,MISUSE OF SECTION-498A IPC,1,Motorbike theft,1,mutual divorce in India,1,National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission,1,Negotiable Instruments Act 1881,1,NGT,1,Non-Disclosure Agreement,1,Online F.I.R,1,Patents Act,1,Pioneer Urban Land & Infrastructure Limited & Anr vs. UOI & Others,1,Police Station,3,Power of Attorney,1,Pre-nuptial Agreement,1,Property Rights of Women,1,Punsihment for hate-speech,1,Rape,1,Real Estate Laws,1,Registration Act,1,RERA,1,right to dignity,1,Right to Equality,2,Right to Health,1,Right to life,6,right to work,1,Rights of home-buyers,1,RIGHTS OF MEN,1,Rights of Patients,1,Rights of Women facing Domestic Violence in India,1,RO Purifiers Banned,1,Safe drinking water,1,Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act,1,Section 154 CrPC,2,Section 300,1,Section 300 CrPC,1,section 375 CrPC,1,Section 375 Rape IPC,1,Section 379 IPC,1,Section 497 IPC,1,Section 498-A,1,Section 498A,1,Section 80 CPC 1908,1,Sedition Law,1,Sexual Harassment at Workplace,1,Supreme Court 2020,1,Supreme Court on Medical Negligence,1,The Dowry Prohibition (Maintenance of Lists of Presents to the Bride and Bridegroom) Rules 1985,1,The Farmers Produce Trade and Commerce (Promotion & Facilitation) Ordinance 2020,1,Vakalatnama,1,Vehicle Theft,1,Wife’s Right,1,WIPO,1,women rights,4,Writs,2,
ltr
item
blog.truelawyer.in: RIGHT AGAINST ILLEGAL DETENTION: WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
RIGHT AGAINST ILLEGAL DETENTION: WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-hncUAMjmyUY/X20KBCws4KI/AAAAAAAAQI0/g8Dr9owwbpAu_jz1IXq-Fmi1CVgOG0omACLcBGAsYHQ/w558-h371/habeas.png
https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-hncUAMjmyUY/X20KBCws4KI/AAAAAAAAQI0/g8Dr9owwbpAu_jz1IXq-Fmi1CVgOG0omACLcBGAsYHQ/s72-w558-c-h371/habeas.png
blog.truelawyer.in
https://blog.truelawyer.in/2020/09/right-against-illegal-detention-writ-of.html
https://blog.truelawyer.in/
https://blog.truelawyer.in/
https://blog.truelawyer.in/2020/09/right-against-illegal-detention-writ-of.html
true
901112480062165705
UTF-8
Loaded All Posts Not found any posts VIEW ALL Readmore Reply Cancel reply Delete By Home PAGES POSTS View All RECOMMENDED FOR YOU LABEL ARCHIVE SEARCH ALL POSTS Not found any post match with your request Back Home Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat January February March April May June July August September October November December Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec just now 1 minute ago $$1$$ minutes ago 1 hour ago $$1$$ hours ago Yesterday $$1$$ days ago $$1$$ weeks ago more than 5 weeks ago Followers Follow THIS PREMIUM CONTENT IS LOCKED STEP 1: Share to a social network STEP 2: Click the link on your social network Copy All Code Select All Code All codes were copied to your clipboard Can not copy the codes / texts, please press [CTRL]+[C] (or CMD+C with Mac) to copy Table of Content