O n 15 th July 2019 a bill to amend various provisions under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 was presented before the Rajya ...
On 15th July 2019 a bill to amend various
provisions under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 was presented
before the Rajya Sabha and this bill became a law after it was passed by Lok
Sabha and received the president’s assent on 1st August, 2019. The
1996 Act provided provisions which dealt with domestic and international
arbitration and also defined law for smooth functioning of conciliation
proceedings. In general, the two methods of alternate dispute resolution (ADR),
includes arbitration and conciliation and these methods were meant to relieve
the burden on courts already reeling under pressure of case back-logs.
Arbitration allows prompt resolution of the disputes. Basically, arbitration
and conciliation is based on an agreement between the parties to amicably
nominate a person to hear out their cause of grievance and adjudicate upon the
matter in an efficient and swift manner. This is immensely beneficial for keeping
the machinery of smooth business in place.
A new section 1 (ca) is introduced now which defines
the term ‘Arbitral Institution’ as an institution designated by the Supreme
Court or High Court under the Act. The Amendment Act introduces Part 1A which
establishes an independent body for the promotion of ADR methods in India. This
body will be known as ‘Arbitration Council of India’ (ACI) and will be
headquartered at Delhi. The basic function of ACI is maintenance of a
depository of arbitral awards made in India or abroad. The composition of ACI
is as follows:
1. Chairperson
who is either a judge of the Supreme Court or a judge of a High Court or Chief
Justice of a High Court or an eminent person having expert knowledge in
arbitration.
2. Other
members of the body will include eminent arbitration practitioners and
academicians with experience in arbitration and appointees by the government as
well.
Earlier before the amendment, in case of a
disagreement between the disputing parties upon appointment of an arbitrator,
the parties by virtue of section 11 (6) of the act could approach and submit a request
to the Chief Justice of the concerned High Court (in case of domestic
arbitration) or Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of India (in case of
international arbitration) or any other person or institution designated by
such court to appoint an arbitrator. Now
under the new amendment act with the insertion of Section 11 (3A), the Supreme
Court and High Court may designate this job to an arbitral institution which parties
can approach for the appointment of an arbitrator. For appointments of
international arbitration, institution will be designated by the Supreme Court,
and for domestic arbitration, institution will be designated by the concerned
High Court. Also, it is made clear that in case of disagreement, the
application for appointment of an arbitrator is to be disposed of within period
of thirty days either by Supreme Court or High Court.
In the Earlier Act, there was no provision regarding
the time limit for submitting written submissions of claim and defence. In the
new amendment act section 23 states that such submissions must be completed
within a period of six months from the date the arbitrator or all the arbitrators
has received notice in writing of their appointments. Also, other than the
international commercial arbitrations, now the arbitral awards will be made by
the arbitration tribunal within a time limit of twelve months from the date of
completion of proceedings. . The
amendment act clearly signifies that the arbitrators, arbitral institutions and
the parties in dispute must maintain confidentiality of all the proceedings
except where it becomes necessary to disclose the award for its implementation
or enforcement.
Also, the amendment act over rules the observation
laid down by the Supreme Court in BCCI vs Kochi Pvt. Limited 2018. It has been
made clear that unless the parties agree, the amendments made in the
Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Act, 2015 will not apply to the
arbitral proceedings that commenced before the amendment act of 2015 i.e.,
before October 23, 2015.
Thus, the government has initiated efforts to
strengthen the arbitration process. Setting up of ACI is a prominent step which
can further help India into becoming a global competent jurisdiction of
Arbitration. The delegation of powers and introduction to maintain
confidentiality is a welcome step towards making India an arbitration friendly
jurisdiction.
COMMENTS